Google AI Beats S. Korean Go Master to Close the Tournament 4-1 | Be Korea-savvy

Google AI Beats S. Korean Go Master to Close the Tournament 4-1


In this photo provided by Google, South Korean Go player Lee Se-dol (R) places his stone against Google's artificial intelligence program AlphaGo during their fifth Go match at the Four Seasons Hotel in Seoul on March 15, 2016. (Image : Yonhap)

In this photo provided by Google, South Korean Go player Lee Se-dol (R) places his stone against Google’s artificial intelligence program AlphaGo during their fifth Go match at the Four Seasons Hotel in Seoul on March 15, 2016. (Image : Yonhap)

SEOUL, March 15 (Korea Bizwire)There was no mercy from the machine.

Google‘s artificial intelligence (AI) program AlphaGo beat South Korean Go champ Lee Se-dol in their final Go match on Tuesday, taking the five-round Go tournament with a score of 4-1. 

At the fifth man-versus-computer showdown in Seoul, AlphaGo, the AI designed by Google’s London-based firm DeepMind, edged out Lee with a win by resignation in 280 moves after playing five hours. 

The self-learning program already clinched the series win at the special Go tournament named Google DeepMind Challenge Match after winning three straight games last week before Lee struck back with a victory on Sunday. Google said that the tournament prize money of US$1 million will be donated to UNICEF and other charities.

Lee, 33, is a ninth-dan player who went pro at the age of 12 and has won 18 international trophies. AlphaGo first made headlines last October after beating European champion Fan Hui, a second-dan player, in five consecutive matches.

Go, known as “baduk” in Korea, originated in China more than 2,500 years ago. It involves two players alternately putting black and white stones on a checkerboard-like grid of 19 lines by 19 lines. The object is to claim larger territories than one’s opponent by surrounding vacant areas of the board using one’s own stones.

Go has been viewed as one of the hardest games for computers to master. Google said the possible number of board configurations for Go is larger than the number of atoms in the universe.

Just like he promised on Sunday, Lee picked up black stones, which doesn’t get “komi” or compensation points of 7.5 under the Chinese rule, and initiated his game by occupying a 3-4 point in the top right corner.

AlphaGo, whose moves are actually placed on the board by Google DeepMind programmer and amateur 6-dan Go player Aja Huang, went for its usual move taking the “flower points” or 4-4 point in the top left corner.

Their fight broke out in the bottom right corner, which Lee managed to save some points against AlphaGo’s white stones. The engagement then started in the left top corner and the sequence moved on to the top right corner in which Lee’s effort to reduce the white’s influence. But this also allowed AlphaGo to get territories in the center.

But coming off from concern of getting swept by the machine, Lee showed his usual style of direct play, going center to ruin the AlphaGo’s presumed territories in the center and bottom left corner.

AlphaGo, which displayed a couple of “suicidal” moves on Sunday, also showed some strange moves in the middle of the game and consumed more time than it did in the last four matches, boosting hopes for humans of getting another victory. 

While uncertainties rose in the center of the board, Lee used his allotted two-hour time after the game was played for 3 hours and 40 minutes. At that moment, AlphaGo had about 20 minutes left.

The AI also entered 60-second overtime use in the end of the game, but AlphaGo’s cold calculation of territories closed the match in its favor.

“AlphaGo really plays well in the closing phase of the game,” said Yoo Chang-hyuk, a ninth-dan player who was commentating the match. “In order to beat AlphaGo, humans need to plays their best game from the beginning to the end.”

(Yonhap)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>