Samsung Affiliates Fined 235 bln Won for Unfair Biz Practice | Be Korea-savvy

Samsung Affiliates Fined 235 bln Won for Unfair Biz Practice


The headquarters of Samsung Electronics Co. in southern Seoul. (Yonhap)

The headquarters of Samsung Electronics Co. in southern Seoul. (Yonhap)

SEOUL, June 24 (Korea Bizwire)South Korea’s antitrust regulator said Thursday it has decided to fine five affiliates of Samsung Group a combined 234.9 billion won (US$206 million) for their alleged unfair business practice over an in-house cafeteria business.

The Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) also said it will file complaints with the prosecution against Samsung Electronics Co. and its former executive Choi Gee-sung over alleged unfair support for Samsung Welstory Inc., the group’s food service affiliate.

Samsung Electronics, Samsung Display and two other Samsung units are alleged to have unfairly supported Samsung Welstory since 2013 by allowing it to run their in-house cafeteria business for them.

The regulator said Samsung Electronics and four other units, including Samsung Welstory, will face the largest-ever fine imposed for an unfair internal trading case.

Samsung Electronics, the group’s crown jewel, will face a 101.2 billion-won fine, also the largest-ever one for a single company.

Established in 2013, Samsung Welstory is a wholly owned affiliate of Samsung C&T Corp., the group’s de facto holding company. Lee Jae-yong, the apparent heir of Samsung Group, is the largest shareholder of Samsung C&T.

The commission said the four Samsung units helped Samsung Welstory continue to maintain high profitability by unfairly supporting labor and other costs.

The KFTC said Samsung Welstory has served as a “cash cow” for the group’s founding family as large amounts of net profits by the cafeteria business affiliate were provided to Samsung C&T as dividends.

Established in 2013, Samsung Welstory became a major food service provider in the country. (image: Samsung Welstory)

Established in 2013, Samsung Welstory became a major food service provider in the country. (image: Samsung Welstory)

Still, the commission said it has not found evidence showing that Samsung’s owner family, including Lee, may have been involved in the unfair support case for the managerial succession process.

Internal trading is blamed here for allowing owner families of conglomerates to easily net large profits by having subsidiaries award lucrative contracts to each other, undermining the principle of fair competition.

Earlier this month, the KFTC did not approve the Samsung affiliates’ proposed measures to address their unfair business activity, including lowering the entry barrier for their cafeteria business to non-affiliated firms.

Samsung Electronics expressed regret over the commission’s ruling, saying that it plans to lodge an administrative suit.

“It is regrettable that the business activity that we’ve done for employees’ welfare was judged as unfair support,” the company said in a statement. “We plan to take legal actions to vindicate it was normal transactions.”

The company also said it will voluntarily permit non-affiliated firms to take part in its in-house cafeteria business, regardless of the KFTC’s rejection of its proposed remedy.

(Yonhap)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>